The past few days seem to have been quite interesting in the comments section of the the Mini-Microsoft blog. Ex-Microsoft employee, Robert Scoble jumped into some comment threads where some of his former bosses were being criticized (start here) and it quickly devolved into a flame war. In the aftermath of that flame war, Mini posted an entry entitled Bad Mini, Scoble's Exit, and Truthiness - Links which also led to another series of interesting comments from Robert. The most interesting of which seems not to have been posted but is instead referenced in this excerpted comment by Who da'Punk (aka Mini-Microsoft)

Okay, okay, hold on... things are getting heated again. I've got about six posts in the queue, including Mr. Scoble's "Goodbye I won't ever be commenting here again," comment. So, please hold on to your "Grr, Scoble!" comments because he won't be following up, let alone perhaps reading them. You'd be much better served submitting your comments to his blog or writing your own blog entries and linking appropriately.
...
In the meantime, I'm certainly thinking about Scoble's parting strategic comments:

* The Mini-Microsoft blog's impact has come, been done, and is past.

* The blog serves now to harm Microsoft more than help it.

* The blog is, specifically, being used by the anti-Microsoft crowd and competitors to harm Microsoft.

All good points, and some, worth putting up a pivotal post about.

But not today. Go have fun.

I find it hard to disagree with Robert's above points. The Mini-Microsoft blog has served as a place for Microsoft employees to discuss what riles them about the company in an anonymous setting that is free of recrimination. From my perspective, this has been both good and bad. It has been good to have a forum where people can discuss some aspects of the culture that have been taken for granted but were actually harmful such as The Curve without fear of being attacked for questioning the status quo. Although, it would have been better for this discussion to happen internally there are a number of social and technological reasons why this is difficult.

On the flip side, the Mini-Microsoft blog is a forum where disgruntled employees pour out their bile on the fellow employees and the company as a whole. I've seen character assassination, racism, sexism, fear mongering, unfounded allegations of sexual misconduct, information leaking, and more in the comments section of the Mini-Microsoft blog. However you slice it, it reflects badly on Microsoft that the people posting these comments appear to be Microsoft employees. What is even more interesting is when you consider Robert Scoble's allegation below

Anonymous bloggers are never as credible as ones who stick their names on things.

Why does it bother me? Cause Mini is being used by non-Microsoft employees to hurt Microsoft. I've learned that a lot of the posts here that you're reading aren't done by Microsoft employees.

Yet you are taking it on face value that everyone is being straight up with you here. They are not.

I didn't realize this until after I had left Microsoft (it's funny how people tell you stuff when you aren't a Microsoft employee anymore). I'm not willing to expose my source, though. But I believe him.

That competitors would astroturf the Mini-Microsoft blog or use it as a recruiting tool when competing against Microsoft for a candidate doesn't surprise me. The surprise is that both Mini-Microsoft and Robert Scoble seem to be taken aback by this. I guess I'm more cynical than most.

The bottom line is that I agree with Robert that in its current incarnation Mini-Microsoft does more harm to Microsoft than good. If anything, it does point out the need for a better internal forums for frank and open discussion but I definitely think it's time is past.   


 

Wednesday, 05 July 2006 18:24:28 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
>>That competitors would astroturf the Mini-Microsoft blog or use it as a recruiting tool when competing against Microsoft for a candidate doesn't surprise me. The surprise is that both Mini-Microsoft and Robert Scoble seem to be taken aback by this. I guess I'm more cynical than most. >>

You're not a cynic but a realist. I've seen this both on the products I've worked on as well as others. If bloggers are viewed as press, then what will stop a company from using material from a blog to their advantage?

As for Scoble, I've been looking for a reason to keep reading his blog but without his connections inside Microsoft and his peeks under the hood, he's just another blogger who is very gifted at messaging and self promotion.
David Leslie
Thursday, 06 July 2006 13:58:05 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"I guess I'm more cynical than most."

Not as cynical as the Microsoft maestros who got dead people to testify in signed letters to the US Federal Department of Justice that punishing Microsoft for its anti-competitive behaviour, was a BAD THING!

It made Microsoft a laughing-stock and thus necessitated Mini!
Wesley Parish
Friday, 07 July 2006 05:13:06 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
OK...

I'll give in, for the sake of arguement. Now here is the real quiz:

Which has done more harm to Microsoft?
a. Microsoft
b. Mini-Microsoft

The answer is, of course, (a). Mini couldn't possibly inflict the damage that Microsoft has inflicted on itself. All Mini has done is publicize it.

Which has done more recently to help Microsoft?
a. Microsoft
b. Mini-Microsoft

The answer is, of course, (b). Hiding mistakes does not fix them. Ignoring mistakes doesn't fix them. Confronting and identifying mistakes is the start of fixing them. Microsoft would never have felt the pressure to correct mistakes without Mini's public disclosures. That certainly overshadows any recent gloating over the demize and departure of any specific former employee.
Dave
Friday, 07 July 2006 12:33:42 (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Scoble and mini were/are very naieve. I concluded long ago that non-Microsoft employees were posing as such on that blog to tear Microsoft down. I also frequent various tech message boards and the anti-MSFT contingent frequenly cites mini's blog as evidence that Microsoft sucks or whatever.

Besides the posers, 90% of the real MSFT employees that post at minimsft are disgruntled employees, which can be found at any company.

I guess I was raised not to air my family's or workplace's dirty laundry in public, as it gives the impression that only you have dirty laundry while everyone else's is pristine.

Oh, I also don't like the fact that anon posters at minimsft openly attack Microsoft projects, suggest that the projects be disbanded and the workers be RIFed because those projects don't raise the stock price. The problem being that these anons don't reveal *their* projects, so there's no way to judge whether *their* projects are money-drainers and that *they* should be RIFed instead. Indeed, we don't know whether mini himself works on a money-losing project while he calls for massive RIFs of anyone but himself.
Bruno
Comments are closed.