A few months ago Dave Winer posted the subscriptions harmonizer RFC which had the following problem statment and goals
Here's a new Web Service for people who use aggregators and have more than one computer. The problem: I subscribe to a feed at home but my aggregator at work doesn't know about it, and vice versa. This document is an RFC, and a roadmap for deployment.Goals 1. The solution should work equally well for any aggregator. It should be possible, for example to use NetNewsWire on a Mac at home; Radio UserLand on a Windows machine at work; or AmphetaDesk on a Linux laptop. The subscriptions of each should be harmonized without the harmonizer knowing what app is talking to it.2. It should rely as little as possible on the centralized component. I will operate a prototype service at Harvard, but it will be limited to 1000 users, and each user will only be able to harmonize 100 times per day. The protocol will be openly specified and clonable. I'm only trying to solve the technological problem, not the economic one.
I didn't like the proposed solution for a number of reasons, the main one being that it required a centralized server that was outside my control. However I had expected some adoption of this proposal by various aggregators and blogging tools but there wasn't much of a ripple caused by Dave's RFC.
A few weeks ago Steve Tibbet launched a discussion on the RSS Bandit messageboard on subscriptions harmonizers. He also checked-in some code which I finally got around to reviewing and modifying today. The discussion revolved around how best to synchronize feeds in a way that gives users choice and flexibility. We settled on four approaches, three of which are currently checked in.
Below is a screenshot of the remote storage configuration tab.
ISSUES WE'VE COME UP AGAINST